2022 Commercial Law, Q7

[This item has two questions.] LOKO Co., using a fraudulent scheme, was able to sell its shares to investors. The sale proceeds were then secretly diverted by LOKO Co. to its wholly owned subsidiaries. Later, LOKO Co. became insolvent and was placed under receivership. On behalf of the investor-stockholders, the receiver demanded the inspection of the books and records of LOKO Co.’s subsidiaries.

Quick check

Does a stockholder's right of inspection extend to the books of a wholly-owned subsidiary under Gokongwei, Jr. v. SEC?

What legal classification applies to an action by stockholders against a corporation to enforce inspection of corporate books?

Why are the records of a wholly-owned subsidiary subject to inspection by the parent corporation's stockholders?

Which court exercises jurisdiction over intra-corporate controversies involving inspection of corporate records?

Choices available with full access.

Which statute governs the general right of stockholders to inspect corporate books and records in the Philippines?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Commercial and Tax Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Inspection Right Scope
Under Section 73 of the Revised Corporation Code (Republic Act Number 11232) and Gokongwei, Junior versus Securities and Exchange Commission, a stockholder's statutory right to inspect corporate books and records extends to the financial records and operational books of a wholly-owned subsidiary. When a parent corporation exercises full ownership, management, and control over its subsidiary, the subsidiary's corporate books are deemed within the control and constructive possession of the parent company. Consequently, stockholders of the parent corporation may inspect the subsidiary's records to prevent fraudulent corporate concealment and safeguard investment equity.

2. Intra-Corporate Controversies
Under the Interim Rules of Procedure Governing Intra-Corporate Controversies (Administrative Matter Number 01-2-04-SC), disputes arising out of intra-corporate relations between stockholders and the corporation, or between the corporation and the public or state regarding its franchise, constitute intra-corporate controversies. Actions enforcing a stockholder's right of inspection or seeking redress for fraudulent schemes committed by corporate officers directly affecting stockholders fall under the specialized jurisdiction of Regional Trial Courts designated as Commercial Courts, enforcing statutory corporate governance duties.

3. Receivership Powers
Under Section 119 of the Revised Corporation Code and insolvency laws, a court-appointed receiver assumes custody and control over the assets, records, and business affairs of an insolvent corporation. The receiver acts as an officer of the court representing both the corporate entity and its creditors and stockholders. In enforcing corporate rights and recovering diverted assets, the receiver possesses full legal authority to demand the inspection of financial records of wholly-owned subsidiaries used as conduits for fraudulent asset diversion schemes.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026