The Metropolitan Trial Court (MeTC) convicted Ivanka of theft and imposed upon her the indeterminate penalty of one year and eight months, as minimum, to three years, six months and 21 days, as maximum. Ivanka timely filed a notice of appeal. The MeTC then transmitted the records of the criminal case to the Regional Trial Court (RTC). Thereafter, the RTC directed Ivanka to file a memorandum of appeal. However, Ivanka failed to submit her memorandum despite notice. The RTC then dismissed Ivanka’s appeal for failure to file the required memorandum. Did the RTC properly dismiss Ivanka’s appeal for failure to file the required memorandum? Explain.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, the RTC did not properly dismiss Ivanka's appeal. Under Section 9(c), Rule 122 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon submission of memoranda or expiration of the period to file them, the Regional Trial Court
Unlock the full Remedial Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Was the RTC correct in dismissing Ivanka's appeal for her failure to file the required memorandum of appeal?
Failure to submit a memorandum of appeal in a criminal case is not a ground for dismissal under Rule 122.
Under Rule 122, Section 9(c) of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, how must the RTC decide an appeal from a first-level court?
Section 9(c) mandates that the RTC decide the appeal based on the entire record and any filed memoranda.
How does criminal procedure differ from civil procedure regarding the failure to file an appellant's memorandum?
Civil rules allow dismissal for failure to file a memorandum, whereas criminal rules require decision on the merits.
What is the legal effect of appealing a criminal conviction from a first-level court to the Regional Trial Court?
Choices available with full access.
What should the RTC do upon the expiration of the period to file a memorandum of appeal in a criminal case?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Criminal Appeal Procedure
Under Rule 122, Section 9(c) of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, when an appeal from a first-level court is taken to the Regional Trial Court, the RTC shall direct the parties to submit their respective memoranda. Upon the submission of the memoranda or the expiration of the period to file them, the RTC is required to decide the case on the basis of the entire record of the proceedings and any memoranda submitted. The court must render a decision on the merits rather than dismiss the appeal procedurally.
2. Memorandum Failure Distinction
In civil procedure, Rule 40, Section 7 explicitly provides that failure of the appellant to file a memorandum of appeal is a ground for dismissal of the appeal. In contrast, in criminal procedure, Rule 122 contains no corresponding rule allowing dismissal of an accused's appeal for failure to file a memorandum. Because an appeal in a criminal case opens the entire record for review, the trial court cannot dismiss the appeal solely due to the absence of the appellant's memorandum.
3. Review on Merits
In criminal cases, an appeal throws the entire case open for review, obligating the appellate court to examine all evidence and trial proceedings to determine whether the guilt of the accused has been proven beyond reasonable doubt. Dismissing an appeal on a technicality, such as the non-filing of a memorandum, deprives the accused of substantive due process. The appellate court must review the records to affirm, modify, or reverse the conviction regardless of whether a memorandum was filed.