Sharon owned a parcel of land adjoining the sea with flat terrain at the center and elevated rocky northern part. Sharon executed a written instrument where she donated the portion with flat terrain to Nicholas who accepted it in the same instrument. After survey, Nicholas discovered that the land described in the deed of donation refers to the rocky northern portion. However, Sharon already died without correcting the mistake. Nicholas asked the heirs of Sharon to execute an amended deed of donation over the flat terrain but was refused. Nicholas filed against the heirs of Sharon an action for reformation of instrument to reflect the real intention of the parties. May the trial court compel the heirs of Sharon to reform the instrument and execute an amended deed of donation? Explain.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
No, the trial court may not compel Sharon's heirs to reform the instrument. Under Article 1366(1) of the Civil Code, there shall be no reformation of instruments in simple donations inter vivos wherein no condition is
Unlock the full Civil Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Under Article 1366(1) of the Civil Code, in which of the following contracts is reformation of an instrument expressly prohibited?
Article 1366(1) explicitly prohibits reformation in simple donations inter vivos wherein no condition is imposed.
What is the legal nature of a simple donation inter vivos under Philippine civil law?
A simple donation inter vivos is a purely gratuitous disposition made out of liberality without conditions.
Why does equity refuse to compel a donor or her heirs to reform a simple deed of donation?
Equity will not aid a volunteer donee who gave no consideration to enforce reformation against the donor's estate.
In which scenario would reformation of a donation inter vivos be legally permissible?
Choices available with full access.
Why was Nicholas unable to compel Sharon's heirs to reform the deed of donation?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Reformation of Instruments
Reformation of instruments is an equitable remedy granted under Article 1359 of the Civil Code when the true intention of the contracting parties is not expressed in the written instrument by reason of mistake, fraud, inequitable conduct, or accident. Through reformation, the written agreement is corrected to express the real meeting of minds between the parties. However, reformation does not create a new contract; it merely conforms the written instrument to the actual agreement that was already perfected and agreed upon by the contracting parties.
2. Simple Donation Exception
Under Article 1366(1) of the Civil Code, reformation of an instrument is explicitly prohibited in simple donations inter vivos wherein no condition is imposed. A simple donation is an act of pure liberality where the donor receives no equivalent performance or consideration from the donee. Because the disposition is purely gratuitous, the law denies the donee an equitable action to compel the donor or her heirs to correct a mistaken description or amend the written deed of donation.
3. Gratuitous Intent Equity
Equity will not intervene to compel a donor or her surviving heirs to perform or reform a purely gratuitous act. Since a simple donee pays no value and undertakes no burdensome obligations, he acquires no equitable right to enforce a reformation against the donor's estate. The statutory prohibition under Article 1366 safeguards donors from involuntary equity suits and respects the voluntary nature of liberality, ensuring that heirs cannot be legally coerced into executing amended deeds for unconditional donations.