2025 Labor Law, Q15

In G.R. No. 123456, the Supreme Court declared ABC Company liable for illegal dismissal when it terminated the services of X without just or authorized cause. Following the finality of the decision, X filed a petition for computation of backwages and separation pay to be reckoned from the date he got illegally terminated until the finality of the decision in G.R. No. 123456. ABC Company, however, argued that the computation should be reckoned from the date of termination of employment until the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) rendered its judgment finding that X was illegally dismissed. Decide with reason(s).

Quick check

Up to what point in time are backwages computed when separation pay is awarded in lieu of reinstatement in an illegal dismissal case?

When separation pay is granted in lieu of reinstatement, how is the employee's period of service reckoned for its computation?

Why does the employer-employee relationship legally persist during the pendency of judicial appeals in an illegal dismissal case?

What is the legal effect of an employer appealing a labor tribunal ruling that declared an employee illegally dismissed?

Choices available with full access.

Which landmark doctrine establishes that backwages and separation pay accrue until the finality of the decision awarding separation pay in lieu of reinstatement?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Labor Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Backwages Computation Period
Under Article 294 of the Labor Code, an illegally dismissed employee is entitled to full backwages computed from the time compensation was withheld up to the time of actual reinstatement. However, when reinstatement is no longer viable and separation pay is awarded in lieu thereof, jurisprudence (Bani Rural Bank v. De Guzman) dictates that backwages accrue from the date of illegal termination until the finality of the decision finding illegal dismissal. The employer-employee relationship persists legally throughout the appellate process, ending only when the judicial decision awarding separation pay becomes final and executory.

2. Separation Pay Cutoff
Separation pay awarded in lieu of reinstatement serves as a statutory substitute for the restoration of the worker to their former position. In Bani Rural Bank v. De Guzman and subsequent rulings, the Supreme Court clarified that the length of service for computing separation pay must be reckoned from the first day of employment up to the finality of the judgment declaring illegal dismissal. Because the legal tie between employer and employee is officially severed only upon finality of the ruling, service tenure continues to accumulate during the pendency of judicial appeals.

3. Effect of Appeal
An employer's decision to appeal a labor tribunal's finding of illegal dismissal prolongs the subsistence of the legal employment relationship. The contention that monetary awards should stop accruing upon the rendering of an intermediate judgment, such as an NLRC resolution, is legally erroneous. Intermediate decisions remain subject to review, modification, or reversal by higher courts. Consequently, monetary liabilities, including backwages and separation pay, continue to accrue until the final judgment of the highest court attains finality, preventing premature termination of the employer's statutory obligations.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026