Hayes, unemployed, was annoyed at his neighbor Dolly because she was constantly nagging him. One morning, while Hayes was drinking coffee in front of his house, Dolly approached him and berated him. She told him that he was just a burden to society and that he should find a job. Hayes has had enough of Dolly’s nagging. Thus, to scare her and compel her to stop talking to him, Hayes forcefully grabbed and took the necklace that Dolly was wearing. Shocked and fearful, Dolly reported Hayes to the police, and she never spoke to him again. What crime did Hayes commit, if any? Explain.
Suggested answer only. Not an official answer and not legal advice.
Hayes committed the crime of Grave Coercion under Article 286 of the Revised Penal Code. Under Article 286 of the Revised Penal Code, grave coercion is committed when a person, without authority of law, prevents another from doing something legal or
Unlock the full Criminal Law answers365 days of full access. GCash, Maya and card accepted.
This is not an official scoring system and carries no weight with the Supreme Court or any bar review provider. It measures how much of the suggested answer's wording your response covers, not whether your reasoning is correct. For practice only.
Quick check
Why is Hayes criminally liable for Grave Coercion rather than Robbery under the Revised Penal Code?
Hayes committed grave coercion instead of robbery because physical force was used to compel Dolly to stop talking rather than with intent to gain.
What essential element of property crimes is absent when personal property is forcefully taken solely to stop another from berating them?
Taking property forcibly without animus lucrandi or intent to gain negates robbery or theft and instead constitutes grave coercion under Article 286 of the Revised Penal Code.
Under Article 286 of the Revised Penal Code, what constitutes the gravamen of Grave Coercion?
Grave coercion is committed when a person prevents another from doing something legal or compels them to do something against their will through violence, threats, or intimidation.
How does animus lucrandi distinguish Robbery from Grave Coercion when force is used during a taking?
Choices available with full access.
What crime did Hayes commit when he forcefully grabbed Dolly's necklace to stop her from nagging him?
Choices available with full access.
Learn more about these topics
1. Grave Coercion
Article 286 of the Revised Penal Code penalizes grave coercion, which occurs when a person prevents another from doing something not prohibited by law or compels them to perform an act against their will. To sustain a conviction, the prevention or compulsion must be accomplished through violence, threats, or intimidation without authority of law or lawful right. The gravamen of this offense is an attack on personal liberty, upholding the principle that no individual may take the law into their own hands. Coercion is consummated regardless of whether the victim accedes to the offender's demand.
2. Animus Lucrandi
Animus lucrandi, or intent to gain, is an essential element in crimes against property, such as theft and robbery. While intent to gain is ordinarily presumed from the unlawful taking of personal property, this presumption is rebuttable by evidence showing a different intent. When property is taken due to hate, ill-feeling, or solely to compel or stop a person's conduct, intent to gain is absent. Without animus lucrandi, an offender who forcibly takes personal property cannot be held criminally liable for robbery or theft.
3. Robbery Versus Coercion
Robbery with violence and grave coercion are distinguished primarily by the presence or absence of intent to gain. In robbery, violence or intimidation is employed specifically to take personal property with animus lucrandi. Conversely, grave coercion involves violence or intimidation directed at restraining the victim's liberty or compelling conduct against their will, without any purpose of financial or material gain. Therefore, when an offender uses physical force to take property without intent to gain, the criminal act constitutes grave coercion rather than robbery.