2026 Civil Law, Q10

Connie is the registered owner of a 20-hectare parcel of land in Batangas City. In 2020, Connie passed away. In 2022, Jem forged her aunt Connie’s signature and sold the Batangas property to Benny. In turn, Benny registered the sale and obtained a certificate of title in his name. The heirs of Connie found out about the forged sale. They filed an action to annul the sale and nullify Benny’s certificate of title. They also caused the annotation of a notice of lis pendens on Benny’s title. While the case was pending, Benny sold the Batangas property to ABC Realty Inc., a property developer, who obtained title in its name and intervened in the pending suit as a transferee pendente lite. After trial, the court rendered judgment in favor of Connie’s heirs, voided the sale to Benny, and nullified his title and all titles derived therefrom. After the judgment in favor of Connie’s heirs became final, ABC Realty Inc. filed a claim against the Register of Deeds of Batangas and the National Treasurer for compensation on the ground of the fraud committed by Jem and Benny. Is ABC Realty Inc. entitled to its claim of compensation for the loss of the Batangas property due to the fraud committed by the vendors? Explain.

Quick check

What is a condition sine qua non to recover compensation from the Assurance Fund under Section 95 of P.D. 1529?

What is the legal effect of annotating a notice of lis pendens on a Torrens certificate of title under Section 76 of P.D. 1529?

Why did ABC Realty Inc. fail to qualify as an innocent purchaser for value when it bought the property from Benny?

What is the legal position of a transferee pendente lite who acquires real property with an annotated notice of lis pendens?

Choices available with full access.

Why was ABC Realty Inc. barred from recovering damages from the Assurance Fund after the sale to Benny was voided?

Choices available with full access.

Unlock the full Civil Law answers

Learn more about these topics

1. Assurance Fund
Under Section 95 of Presidential Decree No. 1529, the Assurance Fund serves as state insurance to relieve innocent title holders from the harshness of the Torrens system. To claim compensation, a party must sustain loss or land deprivation without negligence due to fraudulent registration following original registration. Crucially, the claimant must be an innocent purchaser for value who is precluded from recovering the land. Without meeting these conditions, no claim against the Assurance Fund can prosper.

2. Lis Pendens Notice
Under Section 76 of Presidential Decree No. 1529, a notice of lis pendens serves as constructive notice that real property is subject to pending litigation. The inscription keeps the property within the court's power to prevent the defeat of a judgment through successive alienations, binding any purchaser to the outcome of the suit. Anyone acquiring property with an annotated notice of lis pendens does so at their own peril and cannot claim to be a buyer in good faith.

3. Innocent Purchaser
An innocent purchaser for value is one who buys property without notice of another's claim and pays a full price before receiving notice of title defects. Good faith must exist at purchase and continue until registration of conveyance. A party acquiring property while a notice of lis pendens is annotated on the title is charged with notice of the litigation defect. Consequently, such transferee pendente lite cannot invoke the protection accorded to innocent purchasers.

About these questions and answers
The questions reproduced here are the official texts of the Philippine Bar Examinations, published by the Supreme Court. They are reproduced for study purposes.The suggested answers are the author’s own.

They are not official answers, have no connection with the Supreme Court, the Office of the Bar Confidant, or any bar review institution, and are not endorsed by any of them. Official answer keys, where released, should be preferred over anything here.Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it creates no lawyer-client relationship. Do not rely on any suggested answer in an actual legal matter. Consult counsel on your own facts.Suggested answers reflect the law and jurisprudence the author considers applicable as of the date shown.

Where a question comes from an earlier examination, the suggested answer applies the law as it now stands, which may differ from the law in force when the question was given, and may therefore differ from what would have been the correct answer at that time. Where the difference is material, the answer notes it.The practice scoring feature measures wording overlap with the suggested answer. It is not a grade, carries no official weight, and says nothing about whether your reasoning is sound.Errors are possible. If you find one, please tell me and I will correct it.Last reviewed: October 2026